Composite layered overlay: micro-invasive approach
https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-67-69
Аннотация
To effectively meet the current function and aesthetic needs of modern dentistry, composites must allow operators to easily replicate layerings without renouncing the restoration effectiveness and durability. This case report describes the composite layered overlay technique restorations of the mandibular posterior teeth that can successfully replace invasive direct restorations.
Список литературы
1. Costa A, Xavier T, Paes-Junior T, Andreatta-Filho O, Borges A. Influence of occlusal contact area on cusp defection and stress distribution. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Nov 1;15(6):699-704.
2. Wiens J, Priebe J. Occlusal stability. Dent Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;58(1):19-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2013.09.014.
3. Monaco C, Bortolotto T, Arena A, Krejci I. Restoring Nonvital Premolars with Composite Resin Onlays: Effect of Different Fiberreinforced Composite Layers on Marginal Adaptation and Fracture Load.J Adhes Dent. 2015 Dec;17(6):567-74. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35251.
4. Moldovan M, Balazsi R, Soanca A, et al. Evaluation of the Degree of Conversion, Residual Monomers and Mechanical Properties of Some Light-Cured Dental Resin Composites. Materials (Basel). 2019;12(13):2109. Published 2019 Jun 30.
5. Agbaje L, Shaba O, Adegbulugbe I. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;13(4):431-5.
6. Decup F, Lasfargues J. Minimal intervention dentistry II: part 4. Minimal intervention techniques of preparation and adhesive restorations. The contribution of the sono-abrasive techniques. Br Dent J. 2014 Apr;216(7):393-400. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2014.246.
7. R.C. Spreafico, I. Krejci, D. Dietschi, Clinical performance and marginal adaptation of class II direct and semidirect composite restorations over 3.5 years in vivo, J. Dent. 33 (2005) 499–507.
8. M.A. Freilich, A.J. Goldberg, R.O. Gilpatrick, R.J. Simonsen, Direct and indirect evaluation of posterior composite restorations at three years, Dent. Mater. 8 (1992) 60–64.
9. J.S. Mendonca, R.G. Neto, S.L. Santiago, J.R. Lauris, M.F. Navarro, R.M. de Carvalho, Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results, J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 11 (2010) 25–32.
10. R. Hickel, J. Manhart, Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure, J. Adhes. Dent. 3 (2001) 45–64.
11. J. Manhart, H. Chen, G. Hamm, R. Hickel, Buonocore Memorial Lecture: review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition, Oper. Dent. 29 (2004) 481–508.
12. M. Thordrup, F. Isidor, Hörsted-Bindslev P: a 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays, Quintessence Int. 32 (2001) 199–205. 13. R.W. Wassell, A.W. Walls, J.F. McCabe, Direct composite inlays versus conventional composite restorations: 5-year follow-up, J. Dent. 28 (2000) 375–382. 14. U.Pallesen, V.Qvist, Compositeresinfillingsandinlays:an11yearevaluation, Clin. Oral Investig. 7 (2003) 71–79
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Rondoni D. Composite layered overlay: micro-invasive approach. Эндодонтия Today. 2019;17(4):67-69. https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-67-69
For citation:
Rondoni D. Composite layered overlay: micro-invasive approach. Endodontics Today. 2019;17(4):67-69. https://doi.org/10.36377/1683-2981-2019-17-4-67-69
Послать статью по эл. почте 